pal-e-docs

Review: Google Play Store submission (round 3)

review-1885-2026-07-25-r3 Review

review ready
Project

Verdict: READY

Round 3 re-review of board item #1885. Previous reviews: review-1885-2026-07-25 (NEEDS_REFINEMENT, 5 findings), review-1885-2026-07-25-r2 (NEEDS_REFINEMENT, 2 remaining findings). Both r2 findings resolved.

Previous Findings Status (r2)

  • [x] Finding 1 (cross-repo AC contradiction) -- RESOLVED. Privacy policy page removed from Agent work AC. Now appears only in Prerequisites as a blocker. Agent work AC reduced to 2 items (signing config, Fastlane scaffold).
  • [x] Finding 2 (arch label wrong project) -- RESOLVED. Board label changed from arch:app to arch:frontend. The arch-frontend note in pal-e-docs belongs to Prediction Assistant, but arch:frontend is an established convention on the ISS board (7+ items use it: landing-page, navigation, UI/UX tickets -- all in done). This is a systemic project-level gap (ISS has no project-specific arch notes), not a ticket-specific scope issue.

Template Completeness

  • [x] Type (Feature)
  • [x] Lineage
  • [x] Repo
  • [x] User Story
  • [x] Context
  • [x] Prerequisites (bonus section, documents blockers)
  • [x] File Targets
  • [x] Feature Flag (none -- acceptable, store submission config)
  • [x] Acceptance Criteria (split into Agent work + Manual steps)
  • [x] Test Expectations
  • [x] Constraints
  • [x] Checklist
  • [x] Related

Traceability

  • [x] story:android-app label -- present on board item
  • [x] story note verified -- android-app found in project-iss user-stories table. Backing doc: docs/ios.md (same Turbo Native model). Success metric: "Play Store app loads the Rails app; same update model as iOS"
  • [x] arch:frontend label -- present on board item
  • [x] arch note exists -- arch-frontend note exists in pal-e-docs. Note: belongs to Prediction Assistant project, but arch:frontend is an established ISS board convention (7+ items). Systemic gap, not ticket-specific.
  • [x] Forgejo issue -- https://forgejo.tail5b443a.ts.net/ldraney/iss-android/issues/1, open

File Targets

  • [x] app/build.gradle.kts -- verified: file exists in iss-android repo. Has release buildType with proguard config (lines 18-23) but no signing config. Ticket correctly identifies signing config needs to be added.
  • [x] fastlane/Fastfile -- empty fastlane/ directory exists. No Fastfile yet. Ticket marks this as conditional ("if using Fastlane"). Acceptable.
  • [x] Store assets directory -- does not exist yet (expected for new creation).

Repo Placement

OK. Issue filed on ldraney/iss-android, board item on board-iss. The Android app is part of the ISS ecosystem. Agent work is scoped entirely to the iss-android repo. Cross-repo privacy page dependency properly scoped as a Prerequisite (blocker), not as agent AC -- resolving the contradiction flagged in r2.

Dependencies

  • Privacy policy page -- documented in Prerequisites as a blocker. No /privacy route, controller, or view exists in ISS Rails app. Properly identified as work that must complete before Play Store submission. Not part of agent AC.
  • Store assets -- documented in Prerequisites as manual work.
  • iOS app (#1798) -- Done. No blocking dependency.
  • Landing page rewrite (#1883/#95) -- In backlog, sprint:E. Not a direct dependency.
  • No items on board-iss currently block this ticket.

Acceptance Criteria

10 total AC (2 agent, 8 manual). Clean agent/manual split. Agent work is tightly scoped: signing config + optional Fastlane scaffold. All criteria are verifiable. Manual steps cover Play Store console operations that an agent cannot perform.

Blast Radius

Self-contained to iss-android repo for code changes. Privacy policy page is a documented prerequisite in a separate repo (ISS Rails app). No downstream consumers affected. No similar patterns in sibling services need updating.

Decomposition Assessment

2 agent AC items (well under 5-AC threshold). File targets in 1 repo (iss-android). Estimated agent work: <5 minutes. No decomposition needed.

Observation (non-blocking)

The issue body contains a stale note referencing arch-app mismatch, but the board label is now arch:frontend. This is cosmetic and does not affect agent execution or scope correctness.

Recommendation

No action needed. Ticket is ready for implementation.