Review: Multi-tenancy sub-3: Test business seed data (re-review)

Verdict: APPROVED

Prior Findings Resolution

• [x] story note -- "multi-tenancy" entry now exists in project-landscaping-assistant user-stories section. Row: Key=multi-tenancy, Role=Platform owner, Summary=Business model with row-level property isolation, Success Metric references #282/#294/#295/#296.
• [x] arch note -- arch-rails-app note confirmed to exist in pal-e-docs (found in note listing).

Template Completeness

• [x] Type -- Feature
• [x] Lineage -- sub-ticket 3 of #282, depends on #294 and #295
• [x] Repo -- ldraney/landscaping-assistant
• [x] User Story -- developer wants realistic test business data
• [x] Context -- explains Business model and controller scoping dependencies
• [x] File Targets -- 1 file to create, 0 to modify, exclusions listed
• [x] Feature Flag -- consumes multi_tenancy from #294, no new flag
• [x] Acceptance Criteria -- 6 criteria
• [x] Test Expectations -- rake task specs + manual verification
• [x] Constraints -- no real data, use existing services, idempotent
• [x] Checklist -- standard PR/tests/no-unrelated
• [x] Related -- parent #282, dependencies #294, #295

Traceability

• [x] story:multi-tenancy label -- present on board item
• [x] story note verified -- "multi-tenancy" entry found in project-landscaping-assistant user-stories section
• [x] arch:rails-app label -- present on board item
• [x] arch note verified -- arch-rails-app note exists in pal-e-docs
• [x] Forgejo issue -- #296, open, valid

File Targets

• [x] lib/tasks/test_business_seed.rake -- to be created. Does not exist yet (confirmed). Directory lib/tasks/ exists with existing rake tasks (crew.rake, feature_flags.rake) that follow the same find_or_create_by! pattern.
• [x] db/seeds.rb -- correctly listed as NOT to touch. Contains existing seed data (8 properties, Mowing/Weeding/Edging & Trimming/Sprinklers services).

Repo Placement

Dependencies

• #294 (Business model, board item 1754) -- backlog. HARD DEPENDENCY. Creates Business model and business_id column on Property.
• #295 (controller scoping, board item 1755) -- backlog. SOFT DEPENDENCY. Seed data validates scoping, but rake task itself doesn't need controller changes.
• #282 (parent epic, board item 1662) -- backlog.
• All dependencies documented in issue Lineage and Related sections.
• The multi_tenancy feature flag does not exist in the codebase yet; will be created by #294.

Acceptance Criteria

• AC1: Create business with slug "greenview-landscaping" -- verifiable
• AC2: ~15 properties with service combos -- references existing services confirmed in db/seeds.rb
• AC3: ~20 work_queue_items with varied completion -- verifiable with count
• AC4: Distinguishable names ("Greenview -" prefix, fictional streets) -- verifiable
• AC5: Idempotent via find_or_create_by! -- consistent with existing rake task patterns
• AC6: Logging output -- verifiable

Blast Radius

• Low risk. Standalone rake task creating test data. No modifications to existing code.
• References existing models (Property, Service, WorkQueueItem) plus Business model from #294.
• Existing db/seeds.rb uses WorkQueueItem.delete_all; the new task correctly avoids touching it.
• No downstream consumers affected. Test data namespaced under "Greenview Landscaping".

Decomposition Assessment

• 1 file to create, 0 to modify -- below threshold
• 6 acceptance criteria -- slightly above 5-AC threshold but all are simple data-creation assertions
• Single repo -- below threshold
• Estimated agent work: ~3-4 minutes
• No decomposition needed.

Recommendation