Review v2: Terraform worktree workflow guardrails (Makefile + SOP fix)

Verdict: APPROVED

Previous Review Issues

• [x] arch-tofu-consumers note missing — FALSE POSITIVE (confirmed). Note exists at slug arch-tofu-consumers (id 2067), created 2026-06-20. Full-text search fails to find it (indexing gap), but direct slug fetch succeeds. Project page project-page-ios-infrastructure also references it in the Architecture section.
• [x] Makefile target naming — FIXED. Issue body updated: AC, test expectations, and file targets all use tofu-plan/tofu-apply/tofu-import/tofu-validate, matching pal-e-platform Makefile convention.

Template Completeness

• [x] Type — Feature
• [x] Lineage — Standalone, discovered during PR #138
• [x] Repo — ldraney/pal-e-services
• [x] User Story — well-formed (platform engineer, worktree guardrails, no flag memorization)
• [x] Context — thorough explanation of gap (plan vs apply locking, flag incantations, Kubernetes backend)
• [x] File Targets — 2 targets (Makefile new, sop-platform-tf-changes update)
• [x] Feature Flag — none (appropriate for DX tooling)
• [x] Acceptance Criteria — 5 items
• [x] Test Expectations — manual verification steps + make tofu-validate
• [x] Constraints — 5 constraints listed
• [x] Checklist — standard 3-item
• [x] Related — 6 references

Traceability

• [x] story:provision label — present on board item
• [x] story note verified — found in project-page-ios-infrastructure user-stories section (key: "provision", role: Platform engineer, metric: "tofu apply provisions bundle IDs, profiles, devices, DNS")
• [x] arch:tofu-consumers label — present on board item
• [x] arch note verified — arch-tofu-consumers (id 2067) exists in pal-e-docs. Covers consumer split between pal-e-platform and pal-e-services, data flow, Keycloak split, and docs pattern.
• [x] Forgejo issue — https://forgejo.tail5b443a.ts.net/ldraney/pal-e-services/issues/140, state: open

File Targets

• [x] Makefile — verified: no Makefile currently exists in pal-e-services repo (confirmed via Forgejo API tree listing). New file creation is correct.
• [x] sop-platform-tf-changes (pal-e-docs) — verified: note exists (slug: sop-platform-tf-changes, id 426), status: active. The pal-e-services section currently says -lock=false for both plan AND apply, confirming the issue's claim that locking is applied too broadly.
• [x] Constraint reference: ~/secrets/pal-e-services/k3s.tfvars — verified: file exists at /home/ldraney/secrets/pal-e-services/k3s.tfvars (9.5k).
• [x] Convention reference: pal-e-platform Makefile — verified: exists with tofu-plan, tofu-apply, tofu-fmt, tofu-init, tofu-secrets, tofu-validate-secrets targets. Issue naming convention matches.

Repo Placement

Dependencies

• No blocking dependencies on the board. Item #1534 (pal-e-services: CLAUDE.md symlink + docs upgrade) is in todo on the same repo but is independent work.
• The worktree-workflow SOP is referenced but does NOT need modification — only sop-platform-tf-changes needs the locking clarification.

Acceptance Criteria

• AC 1-4: Makefile targets — agent can verify by reading generated Makefile and confirming flag usage (-lock=false on plan, default locking on apply/import). Manual testing from /tmp/ clone is appropriate.
• AC 5: SOP update — agent can verify by reading the updated pal-e-docs note content.
• No missing criteria detected. The scope is well-bounded.

Blast Radius

• CI pipeline note: The SOP's pal-e-services section currently uses -lock=false on apply. The ticket explicitly excludes .woodpecker.yaml changes. Acceptable — CI locking semantics differ (in-cluster context). The SOP update should note this distinction.
• pal-e-platform already has a Makefile: Confirmed. New Makefile follows same tofu- prefix convention. No naming conflict.
• No other repos with similar Terraform consumer patterns lack Makefiles (pal-e-platform has one, appstoreconnect-tofu is a provider not a consumer).

Decomposition Assessment

Recommendation